What are the best alternatives to receiving-code-review?
The highest-scoring alternative to receiving-code-review is go-coding-standards from eduardo-sl/go-agent-skills, at 95/100 (grade A) on the Suede Skill Check; receiving-code-review scores 84/100. The table compares 7 code review skills in code review and code quality from other publishers, each with a full SuedeAI.directory page.
receiving-code-review and 7 alternatives
Alternatives share receiving-code-review's category and task, come from other publishers and each have a full directory page. Ranked by Suede Skill Check score.
| Skill | Publisher | Suede Skill Check | License | What it does |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| receiving-code-review Compared skill | obra obra/superpowers | 84/100 · B | MIT | Guides handling code review feedback with technical rigor and verification, rather than performative agreement or blind implementation, especially when feedback is unclear or questionable. |
| go-coding-standards | eduardo-sl eduardo-sl/go-agent-skills | 95/100 · A | MIT | Applies Go coding standards and style conventions from Effective Go and Go Code Review Comments, including import ordering, struct initialization, receivers, and formatting rules. |
| code-reviewer | jeffallan jeffallan/claude-skills | 84/100 · B | MIT | Reviews code diffs and files for bugs, security vulnerabilities, code smells, N+1 queries, and naming issues, then produces a prioritized, structured review report. |
| code-review | phuryn phuryn/pm-skills | 84/100 · B | MIT | Reviews code for actionable defects, centering on correctness with performance and security as optional sub-cases, and tries to refute every candidate finding before reporting. |
| code-review | CodeRabbit Official coderabbitai/skills | 83/100 · B | MIT | Runs CodeRabbit CLI reviews, retrieves saved local or GitHub PR fix prompts, and interprets CodeRabbit authentication and review output. |
| review-local-changes | NeoLabHQ NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit | 78/100 · C | GPL-3.0 | Reviews uncommitted working-tree changes, including untracked files, and returns actionable improvement suggestions before committing, when nothing has been pushed yet. |
| review-pr | NeoLabHQ NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit | 78/100 · C | GPL-3.0 | Reviews an existing GitHub pull request and posts inline review comments on its diff, for changes that are already on an opened PR. |
| traiage-review | NeoLabHQ NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit | 74/100 · C | GPL-3.0 | Prioritizes the changed code in a repository to decide what a human must review. |
Questions and answers
What is the highest-scoring alternative to receiving-code-review?
go-coding-standards from eduardo-sl/go-agent-skills, at 95/100, grade A. It earns full points for structural checks, recent maintenance and instruction depth. Applies Go coding standards and style conventions from Effective Go and Go Code Review Comments, including import ordering, struct initialization, receivers, and formatting rules.
How does receiving-code-review compare with its alternatives?
receiving-code-review scores 84/100, grade B. Of the 7 alternatives, one scores higher, 2 tie and 4 score lower; their scores run from 74 to 95. All of them sit in code review and code quality and match the code review keyword map.
Are the alternatives to receiving-code-review free?
All 7 alternatives to receiving-code-review are published in public GitHub repositories and cost nothing to download. Every one uses an open-source or open-content license, led by MIT (4) and GPL-3.0 (3), so you can use and adapt the files at no cost under those terms.
Do the alternatives to receiving-code-review work in Claude Code, Codex and Cursor?
Yes. Each of the 7 alternatives to receiving-code-review is a SKILL.md folder in the Agent Skills format, which Claude Code, Codex and Cursor all read. The skills CLI (npx skills add) installs every one of them into Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other agents, and each full skill page adds a project-level copy into .claude/skills for Claude Code and .agents/skills for Codex. go-coding-standards declares compatibility in the SKILL.md frontmatter.